Looky at our traffic sources.
Top traffic sources - wisemanpublishers.us | www.google.com | profanejustice.blogspot.com
Wiseman Publishers (ROTFLMAO) is that brain damaged, mean dude who has been cyberstalking people and their disabled children on the Internet and in the real world. Really, the dude has a closed head injury, he's really brain damaged. So this brain-damaged dude he thinks he's a publisher, and a journalist. Whatever. He can't string five words together to make a coherent sentence, and his lack of comprehension is obvious.
Not naming names because this dude is so mean, he targets minor children with disabilities just to get back at their mommies. He's put photo's of people's houses and their children on his shitty site, and accuses law-abiding citizens of things like attempted murder and theft and fraud. He is one scary, bad-ass, brain damaged dude.
But his handlers are worse. They aren't brain damaged, but they exploit this dude to do their dirty work, which is one of the reasons they got sued.
Anyway, on to the real news, Fremont County attorney Dan Slater who is representing certain defendants in the Colorado lawsuit that names AFRA, CPS Watch and other high-profile family rights advocates as defendants has reportedly been advising his clients to infringe the plaintiff's copyrights. WHILE THE SUIT IS STILL ONGOING!
Yep-a-reenie, people. Dan Slater duked it out with the plaintiff, Ms. Shell, today in a series of emails trying to bully her into stop making DMCA claims against the defendants for their publications of a work she claims is infringing her copyright. Failing to manhandle her into submission, he advised his clients to ignore her claims.
Dude, are you really a lawyer? (Yes, he is, but this is how law is practiced in Fremont County, Colorado. It doesn't involve following the law as much as it involves pushing people around by ignoring the law.)
This week in court, the esteemed lawyer Dan Slater complained about people publishing commentary about this lawsuit on the Internet.
So we looked around and do you know who the offenders are? The defendants.
The AFRA web site has snarky comments about Ms. Shell and Leonard Henderson has been scribbling madly about her on his own web site. Billy Wiseman, the bully, his site is full of nonsense and libel about Ms. Shell and the lawsuit. The defendants have been all over the Internet publishing their comments on blogs, news articles and web sites about this lawsuit and about Ms. Shell.
We looked and looked and couldn't find a dad-gummed thing published by Ms. Shell about this lawsuit. Now that doesn't mean she's not talking about it. She shared those emails with us, and yep, the dude told her he advised his clients that they should ignore her DMCA takedown notice. Talking about sharing today's emails, AFRA has some of them published on the AFRA website on the CPSWatch page.
Dude, you really should be talking to your clients about this, not complaining to the judge. What kind of lawyer are you anyway? As sleazy as they come, yep.
Not only that, but there are indications from irate web site owners/infringers who received these takedown notices that he also advised AFRA web site online service provider to ignore her DMCA takedown notice. It seems plausible, because Ms. Shell has not received a reply from Fluid Hosting.
Dude, can you spell malpractice? Telling a web host service to ignore a DMCA notice? How stupid are you?
And what is this about giving case specific legal advise to people who are not your clients? All the defendants have blabbed to Ms. Shell that Dan Slater is giving them legal advice about their pleadings and other procedures in this case, and how to proceed. Isn't that UPL? There is something very stinky in Fremont County, people.
Bottom line, we, in Fremont County are laughing our asses off. Mr. Slater has made this completely personal, its a vendetta against Ms. Shell. We're figuring he's having to work far harder and longer than he anticipated to satisfy this vendetta, and it's costing far more than he anticipated. Top that off with defendants who lie to and about Ms. Shell, so they're likely lying to him, too. That makes him mean, and he gets snarky with Ms. Shell.
Who won?
After the email exchange, the infringing content came down from the AFRA web site, but Dan Slater had to show his wittle manhood by making a nasty parting shot to Ms. Shell in an email. Score one point to Ms. Shell.
Leonard Henderson had a cute wittle baby temper tantrum and replaced the infringing content on the AFRA web site with the email exchanges about the infringement complete with his butt-hurt commentary, score another point to Ms. Shell.
Lloyd Philips went completely psycho and made threats IN WRITING against Ms. Shell, but took the infringing content off of his first amendment protected harassment web site. Score another point to Ms. Shell.
Cheryl Barnes complained that Yahoo! constantly removes the infringing content from her group, even after she puts it back up. Boo hoo, Barnsie. Like Ms. Shell said to Mr. Slater, dismissal does not mean you have a right to infringe. You just started the clock all over again. Just consider yourself lucky that Yahoo! hasn't shut down your email address and your group for infringement. Just how many more complaints do you think it will take before they do? Care to take Mr. Slater's advise and find out?
Look around, Mr. Slater, when you are in town, in court. We are laughing at you. You aren't in Kansas any more, and Toto just pooped on you.
